• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Expert help - Is this the original lock ?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TheTyler7011

Pilgrim
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
160
Reaction score
152
Hello all, I have an 1816 Flintlock Springfield. I took it to this flintlock historian and he thinks it’s a possibility that it’s original lock for 2 reasons (1): It fits very snug and (2): the patina is the same, even on the spring screws. The lock and barrel plug are both matching 1832.

I have no idea how you can really tell. But figured I’d get your opinions. The lock does look identical to the barrel in terms of pitting and patina. But I understand it’s usually rare that they’re original to the gun.

Any thoughts would be appreciated, as well as how you generally come to the conclusion that they’re original or not.
 

Attachments

  • 615C6D9E-B90E-4E8F-B557-9CA63882F8A0.jpeg
    615C6D9E-B90E-4E8F-B557-9CA63882F8A0.jpeg
    40.8 KB · Views: 178
  • 4E70A79A-3DF4-43B5-9651-6B409888F644.jpeg
    4E70A79A-3DF4-43B5-9651-6B409888F644.jpeg
    63.3 KB · Views: 176
  • 5FD1C483-35CF-4E63-B274-7C50721407D9.jpeg
    5FD1C483-35CF-4E63-B274-7C50721407D9.jpeg
    52.8 KB · Views: 189
  • 1F4D1FC4-1DFA-4620-81E3-21F3DD093869.jpeg
    1F4D1FC4-1DFA-4620-81E3-21F3DD093869.jpeg
    59.4 KB · Views: 184
  • 616ED7DD-3522-47D1-97AB-69945786F356.jpeg
    616ED7DD-3522-47D1-97AB-69945786F356.jpeg
    66.3 KB · Views: 172
  • 4E8F97B0-556C-4E43-B6B8-22FC0AE23D60.jpeg
    4E8F97B0-556C-4E43-B6B8-22FC0AE23D60.jpeg
    55.2 KB · Views: 172
  • 9049EB70-D6AD-4A26-B2CD-0B4F90E22EC1.jpeg
    9049EB70-D6AD-4A26-B2CD-0B4F90E22EC1.jpeg
    54.4 KB · Views: 167
  • 4CAD6290-9B59-4E1A-B8D3-2F166F397E21.jpeg
    4CAD6290-9B59-4E1A-B8D3-2F166F397E21.jpeg
    64.2 KB · Views: 148
It sure looks consistent with the barrel when it comes to wear and pitting. If it's a replacement, it's likely it was replaced a long time ago, with an original from the immediate time period, which would seem unlikely. Have you pulled it to look at the innards yet?
 
It sure looks consistent with the barrel when it comes to wear and pitting. If it's a replacement, it's likely it was replaced a long time ago, with an original from the immediate time period, which would seem unlikely. Have you pulled it to look at the innards yet?

I have but it just looks like a lock to me! Not sure what to look for.
 
Age and signs of wear. Do the springs look like they were hand made or parts show file marks? Modern stuff shows more uniformity in thicknesses et, al,. and generally gets finished to a higher polish and finish. Older stuff that wouldn't show on the outside would seem more crude on the non-bearing surfaces.
 
I took it to this flintlock historian and he thinks it’s a possibility that it’s original lock for 2 reasons (1): It fits very snug and (2): the patina is the same …,

First, I'm not an "expert"...

I'd say the lock is waaay too snug for it not to be the..., original to the stock.... ;)
AH but what if the barrel and the lock, (and the rest of the hardware) were installed on a repro stock, perhaps to create an "original" with all "original parts"...or what appears to be such?
Yes the patina appears to match, but what bothers me as I cannot actually hold the musket, is that the patina looks "too perfect". In other words the patina from what I can see appears to be uniform sized pock marks from corrosion on both the barrel AND the lock on all of the steel parts. Almost as though it was done that way on purpose. There are much more experienced people on the forum that can address corrosion, as the barrel steel and the lock steel I thought were often different grades of steel. Thus the patina wouldn't have perfect uniformity, as harder steel on the lock plate would resist corrosion better than the barrel. But..., perhaps the armory that produced that musket used one grade of steel for everything. ???

LD
 
First, I'm not an "expert"...

I'd say the lock is waaay too snug for it not to be the..., original to the stock.... ;)
AH but what if the barrel and the lock, (and the rest of the hardware) were installed on a repro stock, perhaps to create an "original" with all "original parts"...or what appears to be such?
Yes the patina appears to match, but what bothers me as I cannot actually hold the musket, is that the patina looks "too perfect". In other words the patina from what I can see appears to be uniform sized pock marks from corrosion on both the barrel AND the lock on all of the steel parts. Almost as though it was done that way on purpose. There are much more experienced people on the forum that can address corrosion, as the barrel steel and the lock steel I thought were often different grades of steel. Thus the patina wouldn't have perfect uniformity, as harder steel on the lock plate would resist corrosion better than the barrel. But..., perhaps the armory that produced that musket used one grade of steel for everything. ???

LD


The lock is quite darker and has stronger pitting on the lock. But you might be sort of correct with the stock. The patina on the buttplate doesn’t match, but the cartouche lines up with a period correct stock.
 

Attachments

  • 87922618-D120-48A0-9C50-AB6E46F119FB.jpeg
    87922618-D120-48A0-9C50-AB6E46F119FB.jpeg
    241.4 KB · Views: 72
Age and signs of wear. Do the springs look like they were hand made or parts show file marks? Modern stuff shows more uniformity in thicknesses et, al,. and generally gets finished to a higher polish and finish. Older stuff that wouldn't show on the outside would seem more crude on the non-bearing surfaces.

Here’s some photos of the lock. On two parts, their is a translucent/pearlescent “mirror” look to them. Those have to be replacement parts right?
 

Attachments

  • 154B1943-A6DB-4730-91D9-859358CF68DE.jpeg
    154B1943-A6DB-4730-91D9-859358CF68DE.jpeg
    74.8 KB · Views: 116
  • 0FD86469-DED4-4EF9-8820-E4EBDFF0D3BE.jpeg
    0FD86469-DED4-4EF9-8820-E4EBDFF0D3BE.jpeg
    54.2 KB · Views: 109
  • F76C41CE-D0E6-4338-BFA7-9930AA37EAF7.jpeg
    F76C41CE-D0E6-4338-BFA7-9930AA37EAF7.jpeg
    44.1 KB · Views: 104
  • C67B4363-229B-4866-B911-0C1DA55C1AFA.jpeg
    C67B4363-229B-4866-B911-0C1DA55C1AFA.jpeg
    66.2 KB · Views: 100
  • E0C96007-2811-4C1C-BFDD-80403BF0B821.jpeg
    E0C96007-2811-4C1C-BFDD-80403BF0B821.jpeg
    62.3 KB · Views: 100
  • 8B05F320-D259-4C2A-8990-89BB8EC29D9D.jpeg
    8B05F320-D259-4C2A-8990-89BB8EC29D9D.jpeg
    46.3 KB · Views: 96
  • 6DA38CEB-56CE-4C84-918F-8D31CEEBB83E.jpeg
    6DA38CEB-56CE-4C84-918F-8D31CEEBB83E.jpeg
    64.8 KB · Views: 102
  • DA153CD6-DB5C-4225-A49A-F3E068C21086.jpeg
    DA153CD6-DB5C-4225-A49A-F3E068C21086.jpeg
    58.2 KB · Views: 85
  • 78F90DFD-ACEC-4A21-A9D9-64C67548C65F.jpeg
    78F90DFD-ACEC-4A21-A9D9-64C67548C65F.jpeg
    54.1 KB · Views: 102
  • E1977F7F-0964-4E10-8DDC-D8F1067B11CB.jpeg
    E1977F7F-0964-4E10-8DDC-D8F1067B11CB.jpeg
    45.8 KB · Views: 90
Cool, and don't get me wrong, I'd think it would be great to have a musket that old that is so "tight" on the hardware.

LD

I appreciate your feedback. I love these things and even make my own black powder to shoot, but theirs so much to learn when it comes to authenticity
 
To my mostly untrained eye:
The lock is likely original with a few replacement parts internally.
That would makes sense to me because parts do wear out, especially at the points where great pressures are placed at small points, especially like the sear contact surfaces and the tumbler notches.
My opinion? This is really cool gun! Make it proud again and go shoot it!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top