• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Which Cap And Ball Platform, Is the Most Imherently Accurate?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
rodwha,
On the .41 Remington, yep, uses .41 molds. The rear bands get sized to slip into the chambers (not below groove diameter).

So are the grooves the same diameter as the chambers? And what of the lands? Twist rate?

Guessing you use somewhat heavy projectiles since that’s generally a magnum caliber (modern).
 
The chambers are a little bigger in diameter than the rifling groove diameter.
That way when the hind ends of the bullets get sized to slip into the chambers they're not less than groove diameter. The best bullets so far are Lyman numbers 41026 and 41028 and the Lee 195 grain SWC. Using them the same as the old design "conicals", just enjoying the last century of new molds.
 
Back
Top