Micah Clark
45 Cal.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2010
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 3
I am re-reading the Dutch Schoultz system that I purchased a couple months ago.
It has me rethinking a whole lot of things. . . patches and his dry system in particular.
However, I am shooting a .32 . . . my .50 will benefit from what I implement too, but I am OK with how it shoots, as I have taken 2 deer with my Lyman GPR . . . My .32 is a custom TVM w a Rice Barrel that I made. . . and I want tighter groups with it.
The ML ball-weight theory is that a heavy or light ball will spin off target. . . but if a ball, (perhaps particularly as small as a .32 ) . . is deformed when loaded, or etched by rifling, wouldn't it fly more like a spiral football, thus negating the spin off theory? (Just a weird thought in my head.)
Dutch, if you read this, I hope that you are doing well. Your system is a great benefit to our sport . . . though I have not been to the range to start testing yet. . . but if you have any ideas that I should pay particular attention to with a .32 . . . I'm all ears.
Micah in Indiana
It has me rethinking a whole lot of things. . . patches and his dry system in particular.
However, I am shooting a .32 . . . my .50 will benefit from what I implement too, but I am OK with how it shoots, as I have taken 2 deer with my Lyman GPR . . . My .32 is a custom TVM w a Rice Barrel that I made. . . and I want tighter groups with it.
The ML ball-weight theory is that a heavy or light ball will spin off target. . . but if a ball, (perhaps particularly as small as a .32 ) . . is deformed when loaded, or etched by rifling, wouldn't it fly more like a spiral football, thus negating the spin off theory? (Just a weird thought in my head.)
Dutch, if you read this, I hope that you are doing well. Your system is a great benefit to our sport . . . though I have not been to the range to start testing yet. . . but if you have any ideas that I should pay particular attention to with a .32 . . . I'm all ears.
Micah in Indiana