• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades

ASM 1851 Navy revolver

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
One of these days I'll get it all together and go out and fire that thing.Looking at them is fine but they are made for shooting!
 
I recently purchased a black powder revolver second hand from a pawn shop. It's a 44 caliber, brass framed ASM 1851Navy. I think I got fair deal on it as it only cost me $100.00 with the holster. I'm hoping it was taken good care of and not loaded with too hot of charges.It does appear that it was cleaned . I've yet to shoot it but that day is comming. I plan on keeping the loads under 20 grs.(brass!) Do you think round balls from wheel weight lead would be OK? Being second hand I didnt get the manual with it. Any suggestions on the bore size , chamber size and what size nipples. The nipples on the pistol seem to be the factory ones that originally came with the revolver. I also made a press so as not to "stretch" the frame when loading.

Use pure lead. Wheel weights have alloys and can damage the gun.
 
Now to another ASM question . I have read how this model is not up to par with the Pietta or the Uberti as far as metal hardness is concerned. But I've also heard how that is not really true.Does the ASM have a softer
metal than the other Italian repros?. I personally think it takes a back seat to no model in the looks department.

I recently acquired an ASM Colt Walker. I think it's going to be a good idea to install and better quality cylinder pin. Test fired 2 rounds. 454 on 50gn. Already had to add an 0.020 shim at back of wedge. Tried 2 more, 451 40gn and it stayed. What I've read indicates that the main part of the pistol is fair but the wedge is too soft and my experience says so is the cylinder pin.
 
I'm thinking about starting out using "store bought" balls and just save the lead wheel weights for the rifles. Oh a loading press is going to be used and not the rammer on the gun. What exactly did you mean by wheel weights may damage the gun? Were you referring to the brass frame?
 
Ball cast from wheel weights are harder than pure lead balls. Using the rammer to load aball cast from wheel weights may damage the rammer regardless of the material used to make the frame.
 
Late to the party here, but have to strongly express my opinion that anti-sieze is the way to go on nipple threads.

Silicone grease and other stuff are lubricants for moving parts. Anti-sieze is a product that is made specifically for parts that are meant to be stationary until removed.

As stated, a tube is cheap and available at any auto supply. I use it pretty extensively on nearly every fastener when working on cars. Do yourself a favor and remove your lug nuts and apply it there. I have broken wheel studs trying to remove frozen lugnuts. Imagine that scenario roadside trying to change a flat.

Spark plugs are especially critical as a little damage there goes a long way ( i.e. new head $$$$$$). And on that point, there's a proper amount of torque for every fastener in every application.

Fasteners actually work by stretching the threads, not friction. Too loose is as bad as too tight. Matter of fact, unless to the point of damage, tighter is better, the only downside is more force required for removal, but with anti-sieze, that force should be exactly the same force used to tighten it down. Most of the problems with removal are galling or corrosion, both of which are handled by anti-sieze.

As a last word on why too loose is worse. First off, the nipple, or spark plug or fastener can work itself looser. This is extremely critical in nipples and spark plugs, as they are under stress while in operation. As an analogy, imagine a stack of china plates duct taped together and strapped down in the back of a truck going down a bumpy road at high speed. Now imagine the same plates tossed into a loose box in the same truck bed. Which one do you think will make the trip?
 
I do intend to put some sort if anti seize grease on the nipple threads. I almost needed a cheater pipe to remove them the first time. It was like an Italian Gorilla tightened them. And thats scary, because I bought the gun second hand . Which means the nipples were never removed by the original owner. Or it was he who possibly overtightened them?? But the threads look Okay.
 
I'm still at a loss here. Several shooters have told me that wheel weight lead is too hard. That it will damage the frame. Is it the loading or the shooting of hard lead that does the damage and how? Remember I said a loading press is going to be used and not the rammer.
 
Would a .451 ball work in a 44 cal ASM Navy? Would there be enough of a ring of lead shaved off to prevent a chain fire?
 
A ball will smoosh. If you recover a ball that has not been smashed or deformed from hitting something, you will find it is no longer round, but is kind of a round nosed, round based bullet, with a short cylinder section in the middle. This is both from the "bump" when the ball is fired, and the "smoosh" from loading, if it is pressed firmly into the chamber with the rammer. The ball is no longer round when loaded/rammed into the chamber. I may be wrong for sure, but with a hard lead ball, you would not get the additional sealing of the ball smooshing in the cylinder.

I believe, but may again be wrong, and perhaps someone would like to do the test, but if you load a pure lead ball, using firm rammer pressure, then remove the nipple and drive the ball out, you will find that it has smooshed, and will not be round. It will resemble a VERY short round nosed bullet. ??

On another note, the shaving of the ball is not an absolute...neither my Remington Navy or Old Army Colt shave a ring of lead, and have never chain fired. The 1860 did once, which was the ONLY time I ever used 777 in it. I believe that is because the "smoosh" seals the chamber as well as the "shave". And perhaps a smoosh and a shave is the best of both worlds. WIN WIN!! But it requires pure lead. I don't think even a press will smoosh well, with 1/2 wheel weight, or even much less.

Soft lead is what most manufacturers recommend with the Italian replicas, and even the Colt 2nd Gen Black Powder Series. You can shoot harder balls, but, Rat is correct IMHO about getting a better seal with soft lead, also, not a problem if your shooting at least 20 yards distant, but soft lead will flatten out, pancake on impact, less lead coming back at you. I have a press as well, but use soft lead. It is more expensive than using wheel weight mix. I know there are guys that do it, and it hasn't hurt their pistols. You are wise to keep loads light with the brass framed replicas. It really isn't even brass, it is a modern alloy, that is generally stronger than brass, but you can still shoot the arbor loose on an alloy framed revolver shooting full bore loads.

You got a fair price though, holster and all, and it sounds like it wasn't shot much. Enjoy. I too have an 1851 Navy with so called "Reb" brass frame. Mine .36 caliber though. There never was a .44 caliber brass framed Navy revolver, only .36 caliber. That's OK with me. It wouldn't stop me from owning one. Some reenacors hate them since they never were back when, and the PC/HC folks would probably mention that if I hadn't. There wasn't a Ruger Old Army back when either, but I'd sure like to have a good used one if the price was right! LOL Oh, mine is a Pietta BTW. Picked it up on sale at Taylor's & Co. about ten years ago, NIB for $160.00 with extra cylinder included.
They are are very nice looking revolvers with the brass frame for sure.

I would check the arbor length and make sure it's not too short. Most Italian repros the arbor is short. Some of the earlier ones though it was spot on. You didn't give the date letters from the frame so we don't know what year it was made. I have read others that say their old ASM are of very good quality. Good luck, enjoy, and keep us in the loop! You may have a great shooter there!

One other thought. I suspect the manufacturers recommend soft lead because, if there is any misalignment, timing issue, the forcing cone will do a lot better job of compensating with soft lead. Also, if you get a squib load, or forget to load, and the cap pushes the ball into the barrel, the soft lead comes out easier as well.
 
The main damage associated with hard lead is damage to the LOADING LEVER.


Agreed - and more explanatory, it is the amount of EFFORT that you have to put on the loading lever and its axis pin when trying FORCE an oversize and over-hard ball into a hole that is just too small. Using softer pure lead ensures that the effort simply shaves off a very small ring of lead in the chamber-entering process, rather than trying do the same thing with a very much harder lead alloy. Wheel weights contain a proportion of antimony - speciifically used to harden them and render them less susceptibel to damage in use. Wheel weight lead works fine in a nitro-powder revolver or long arm - indeed, most so-called 'hard-cast' bullets made specifically for nitro-powder firearms are about the same hardness as the average wheel-weight, but they are NOT for the muzzleloader.
 
Would a .451 ball work in a 44 cal ASM Navy? Would there be enough of a ring of lead shaved off to prevent a chain fire?
Although chambers may vary in size slightly, be it a .36 or .44 a .451 ball would most likely be too small. It is my belief and many others that putting grease over the ball does nothing to prevent a chainfire. If a pure lead ball leaves a lead ring behind, no sparks will go through. Most of the grease ends up all over the revolver making a mess, little goes down the bore. Best bet is a tight ball on top of a lubed wad. I make my own wads but you can buy them too.
 
Actually I think I did mention that this gun was manufactered in 1994, but it was in a later post. Code is BD on the frame.
I bought a box of lead balls for this gun yesterday, but mistakenly got the wrong size. Got half way home before I realized they were 451s instead of 454s. The place I bought them is an hour away. What would y'all do? Exchange them at a later date or give them a try ?
 
I would measure the cylinder mouth. If the cylinder mouth measures 0.449 or less, I would use them. I would also use a wad under the ball to minimize the chance of a hangfire. You could also try a bee's wax and olive oil mix (50-50) over the ball to help keep the ball in position. But, I would watch for movement of the ball after recoil. It may move forward in the cylinder.

If you can wait, then the better choice would be to wait until you can exchange them.
 
I think I'll just exchange the 451s for 454s.The right size might have to be ordered, though. But I suppose it'll be worth the wait in order to "do it right". But like I said earlier that store is a good hour away. If this store does own a pair of calipers, I'll have them measure the cylinder mouth. 0.449 right? Hurry up and wait!
 
Thanks to each and everyone for your advice and help. And a special thanks to Grenadier1758. It totally slipped my mind about the undersize ball possibly moving inside the cylinder after recoil. That could have made for a bad accident.
 
Back
Top