Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
I watched the movie " The Broken Chain " the other night,In one scene we see crates of kings muskets being traded or given to the natives, I know tradeguns and fowlers were traded, but did the crown ever just outright supply natives with muskets?
The crown did give out some military rank to some Indian leaders, and gave them the marks of the army. From achelogical finds we find few to no kings muskets associated with Indians. After all it’s heavy and bulky. It’s a spear/club that shoots. Indians did not have a culture where in people could be talked into marching in rank,and accepting the causulties that went along with that. All of the famous Indian tribes were just a few thousand people. One death was a national tragedy. In simple military terms giving fusils to Indians made sense. As Indians could operate as a commando force. As good as the Bess was it just wasn’t the best arm for Indians to try and use.
IIRC, Hanson mentions some Land Pattern muskets being supplied to the Cherokee in 1775, but I don't know the basis for this statement. The book in question is currently in storage, so I can't go check, I'm afraid.
English-made copies of Lancaster school longrifles and various fusils would have been a lot more common, certainly.