• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades

CO. Legislators target landowner voucher abuse

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hiker

32 Cal.
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
charlie meyers
Legislators target landowner voucher abuse

By Charlie Meyers
Denver Post Staff Writer[url] DenverPost.com[/url]

One involves action, the other talk, but the overall result from the separate initiatives of two Colorado legislators is likely to produce the same desired result.

Finally, after months of ineffectual wrangling in official wildlife circles, the knotty issue of landowner voucher abuse will be aired in a more public forum, a discourse that just might lead to badly needed reform.

Rep. John Soper, D-Northglenn, today is scheduled to introduce legislation that proposes to alter both the structure of the state wildlife hierarchy and the way preference licenses for big game are doled out.

In short order, Sen. Lois Tochtrop, D-Adams County, will initiate hearings on the allocation of these landowner vouchers, with an eye toward possible future legislative activity.

In both cases, the concern is the same: that a voucher program intended as personal and limited license relief for landowners has evolved into a nightmare of commercial manipulation that threatens the fabric of Colorado hunting.

Soper's bill aims for a return to the original purpose of license preference, which was to provide landowners a guaranteed tag to hunt on their own land.

"The rationale is to start that debate, to get those discussions going and shine some light on the issue," said John Berry, a Denver attorney and lobbyist for the Colorado Sportsmen's Coalition, a supporter of the bill.

Tochtrop called a meeting of the Legislative Sportsmen's Caucus, a forum that of late had fallen into disuse but on Thursday attracted a turnout of a dozen state senators and representatives who have taken sudden interest in license matters.

The gathering at the state Capitol also enticed members of the Colorado Wildlife Federation and other outdoor enthusiasts who spoke against perceived abuses in the current voucher system.

In conclusion, the senator declared her intent to conduct hearings to gather further public testimony on license issues that strike to the very heart of fairness in the outdoor environment.

Landowners currently receive 15 percent of these licenses off the top and 18 months ago launched an all-out campaign for more, a push that continues at every level of formal wildlife management. Only recently has the average sportsman begun to resist.

The most fundamental objection to the voucher system is that it allows wealthy hunters who can afford to pay fees that sometimes range to five figures to jump to the head of the line for the most desirable tags. Next comes the visual obscenity of finding Colorado's best hunting opportunities flaunted on eBay and the websites of license brokers, many from out of state.

Certain reforms might solve most of these ills:

Restrict vouchers to the property owned by the person to which they were issued. This basic element of fairness richly rewards landowners who actually harbor wildlife, not those who don't. It also eliminates undue competition with public hunters on public land, a growing source of abuse and conflict. Requiring voucher holders to use private land also serves to distribute animals that currently use these enclaves for refuge, one of the thorny problems of wildife management.

Eliminate the transfer of vouchers to third parties. Landowners who hold vouchers should designate them directly to family, friends or the hunters who will use them - not to brokers or outfitters for escalating resale.

Hunters who purchase vouchers for areas that require preference points should forfeit whatever points they might possess, just like everyone else.

A current system that allows thousands of leftover vouchers to go unused, with a loss of public opportunity in the most desirable hunt units, must be changed. The recent decision by the Wildlife Commission to charge $25 for unused vouchers is tantamount to putting a Band-Aid on an amputation - classic of that body's impotent approach to a problem raging out of control.

Most of these elements by law require legislative process. It's a course of action long overdue.

Charlie Meyers can be reached at 303-820-1609 or [email protected].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ive seen land owners charge over $100 just to hunt on their land and that was in a cow elk only unit.What happened to the days when a rancher would let you hunt on his land ,and help you get the animal off the feild?Thanks for the post.Will definetly be contacting him.
 
$100 is cheap. Our Wildlife Commission just approved that Colorado landowners can charge up to $500 tresspass fee and STILL get crop damage payments fron DOW!
 
Well, they own the land that the wildlife eats and sleeps on, so they might as well own the wildlife.

Ranchers in New Mexico are charging upwards of $2500 for a private land permit for bull elk. There is a large additonal charge if you take a trophy. Cow permits are going for $500.

Otherwise, you apply and wait and see if you get drawn with everybody else. I had the elk herd pass through our property almost every day, but we didnt have enough land to qualify for a permit. So, I lived up there for 5 years and never got to hunt because I could not afford that sort of money for a permit.

Bill
 
Yep, they ask for a lot of money and they are more and more rude to onter hunters too. One guy told me 'I did not come here from California to have you hunt on my land and kill 'my' animals."
 
Their is plenty of public land to hunt on.I dont hunt private land.If I did it would be in a late season when the elk have moved down.Also I dont know anyone with private land and cant afford to pay them :haha:
 
Well we don't have Elk in Indiana, but the big thing is that leasing companies are moving in and taking up land that a lot of hunters use to hunt on for free or at a very low cost. It kinda sucks but it's their land and why not make money on it? Still a lot of public land to hunt on here.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top