hobowonkanobe said:
and that is the news I both expected and was cringing in anticipation of. That 10k tag is the killer. I paid 1k for mine and thought I might have been excessive in doing so... guess there is way more "excessive" than that.
Still, a neat topic to look into all the same. Kinda like Ferrari's and super models, love to look at em, don' wanna even test drive one tho.
Other than the cheap Numrich Swivel that was on the market back in the 60s-70s I can't see how anyone could make one and sell it for 1000 bucks.
It never ceases to amaze me how people want neat 18th-19th c. guns but want to buy them at far less than the cost of production.
A friend of mine was showing a guy a rifle he built, as is not unusual the guy looked at the rifle and walked away (they often get a "test pattern" look on their faces) and my friend was like "What??". His wife then said "He had no idea what he was looking at" and this is true.
Since it was not a Model 700 Rem he, in all probability, could not comprehend it. Possibly he (and many others) went into a form of sensory overload. Since it is not a cookie cutter gun cranked out in its thousands but rather a finely shaped, carved and engraved rifle perhaps made in a 10x10 converted beadroom (Don King made rifles for a time in a closet meant to contain a roll away bed) it is oddity that is beyond comprehension.
Lack of comprehension and especially appreciation is very common in people whose idea of a ML is a TC or a Lyman. These things are what that are yet people think if they go off most of the time they are wonderful. They are not. They are MLs made so people can buy a cheap ML to hunt in their special ML season in what ever state they happen to live in.
Model 70s, TCs etc are not art forms. They are tools. Like a hammer or a pry bar.
A GOOD Kentucky is a functional art form. It will work better than the factory made ML and it is aesthetically pleasing. It is at home in at art museum as it is in the field shooting deer.
But a great many American shooters have the idea that pretty guns don't shoot. As a result it is not unusual to see target rifles that show far more wear and tear than they should. The owner WANTED them to look beat up. The owner would rather lay the rifle on a concrete floor of an indoor range and move it with his foot than put it in a rack. YES THIS IS TRUE. I guy I knew would do this with the comment "pretty guns don't shoot". He is not alone.
So people will pay 2500 for a souped up 1911 or 900 for a stock S&W revolver but pale at the 1200 or 2500 $ price of a Kentucky with 10-20 times the hand work and shop time built by someone with a skill set far beyond that of the typical worker at S&W or Ruger.
Dan