Yeah, that load and one similar for the 45-70 inspired me to develop and load a whole lot of RB loads in 44 Special and 38 Special, atop tiny charges of powder. You could actually see the ball in flight on a sunny day. They were superbly accurate and really did a number on hares.
Taking it back to muzzleloaders, I based my 32 cal load for hares on performance of 22LR and 25-20, both very capable 50 yard guns in terms of accuracy and trajectory, as well as killing power. I kept pulling down the charge on my 32, starting at 30, then 25, then 20, and now at 15 grains of 3f. I still can't see the ball in flight (most likely due to the white smoke), but I'm not hearing the crack of the sound barrier either. Sighted in an inch low at 50 yards, that load is right on at around 40 yards, a tiny bit high at 30, right on at 25 and progressively lower as the range shortens. Inside 10 yards I have to allow a little bit for sight height above the bore. It reminds me of having a single sight on a bow while shooting "flu-flu" arrows for rabbits, though the arrows' range is lots shorter.
I'm finishing a 30 cal flinter right now, and purely by guess and by golly I anticipate a hunting load down around 10 grains. If the trajectory of its .290 ball is comparable to the .311 of my 32, I'll be a happy camper.
One thing I've noted with all the reduced loads in my guns. Their POI is the same as my heavy loads to at least 25 yards, even if they drop off more as you approach 50. That's fine with me, cuzz these old eyes are only dreaming at the prospect of 50 yard head shots these days. In any case, to 25 yards and a little beyond I can use the light loads without touching the sights, thus leaving my sight-in with heavy loads unaffected.